On fireworks

July 4th, 2007

FireworksAt some point in my life, I grew bored of fireworks.

Up until then, the Fourth of July was a truly, (pardon the pun) explosive occasion. I could give a damn about the picnics, about the visiting family, about the food and the camaraderie and the patriotism and the day off. I wanted to see fireworks – glorious, loud, obnoxiously brilliant fireworks. I wanted everyone to know we were shooting them off. I wanted to smell the sulfur and watch fiery balls explode from cardboard tubes, unsheathed by the powers of a simple lit punk.

Then, suddenly almost, I didn’t care. Much like any youth-driven activity, the thrill of fireworks waned as I grew older. I didn’t believe in Santa. I didn’t search the house for Easter eggs. And I didn’t long for sparklers and snakes.

Now, with the exception of illegally smuggling bottle rockets into Minnesota and firing them off at the bar across the street from my friend Doug’s house, I’m completely done with fireworks. If none show up on the Fourth of July, so be it. I enjoy those things I shunned before – the family, the food, the good times and relaxing days off. Not to say I don’t enjoy a nice fireworks show. I do. But I’m not going to rush around lighting wicks and ducking for cover.

I thought of this today while mowing the lawn. I know that soon, in five or six years, I’ll be back into fireworks again. I’ll have a child that will long for the same things I did – snakes, fun snaps, roman candles, etc. And because of that child’s longing, I will find myself inside another loaded circus tent, sweating and searching through piles of Chinese novelty items, grabbing large boxes of fireworks and tromping through the dusty aisles to pay exorbitant amounts for things that cost just pennies to make.

I’ll do it all happily, too. Because I’ll be brought back 28 years, to when I was that age, impatiently waiting to light my sparklers and celebrate the Fourth of July the only way I knew how – with fire on a stick.


Comments: 1

Issues Considered: On..., Sierra, Vilhauer

Vote for Neshek

July 3rd, 2007

Vote for Neshek!I’m new to this baseball fan thing, so you’ll have to forgive me for forgetting this.

It’s getting close to the MLB All Star Weekend – one of the best sets of All Star festivities in all of sports. And with the Twins currently embroiled in a battle for their Central Division crown, and with Tori Hunter, Justin Morneau and The Best Pitcher in the League Johan Santana set to don their American League All Star jerseys, there’s just one question we all have to ask ourselves.

Have you voted for Pat Neshek yet?

You know – Pat Neshek. The half-sidearm, half-submariner righty Twins reliever that is currently up for the final American League roster spot?

The guy who has 47 strike-outs in just 39 innings? The deceivingly talented pitcher who is carrying a 1.37 ERA into the All Star Break?

Seriously. Go vote. It’s simple – you can even vote multiple times (and it saves your choices, so it’s easy to vote up to 20 times in a sitting. I know. I have.)

He’s fun to watch. And, we need another player on the team – after all, Joe Nathan and Joe Mauer were both left off for only having a 2.20 ERA with 16 saves and only batting .302 this season, respectively. And he’s got his own blog, so he’s one of us. He’s currently in third place. He needs your help.

You have until 6 PM ET on Thursday.

Well, what are you waiting for? VOTE!


Comments: 6

Issues Considered: Baseball, Minnesota Twins, Sports

No crossing zone

July 2nd, 2007

I think BookCrossing is broken.

Either that, or no one that has ever found one of my books has bothered to log on.

I joined BookCrossing last year. I vowed to buy cheap books at the Augustana Book Sale and then release them. My page is here. It lists the books I’ve released. It was supposed to be a fun little project.

The concept is easy – you log books, assign them a number, and give them away. And I did – I gave away a whole crap load of books. A year ago, I gave away tons of them on a rummage sale, with only the instructions to log on to BookCrossing.com and chronicle the book’s travels. I dropped some off at coffee shops. I finished it off a few months ago by dumping the rest of my books at a Dunn Brothers here in Sioux Falls.

Each book has a large sticker on the inside front cover that explains Bookcrossing.com. It gives explicit instructions – step by step, from finding the site to finding the book.

And though I have 27 books on the loose – released into the wild for some unsuspecting reader to find and enjoy – none of them have been “retrieved.”

I know they have been physically retrieved. I saw people take them. But no one wants to log in and let me know where the books have gone.

BookCrossing seems like a great idea. The only problem is getting other people to buy into it.

So if you’re out there and have found one of my books (and this isn’t a stretch – I also placed a sticker that let the book finder know that it was “lost by Black Marks on Wood Pulp”) let me know. I’d hate to think all the time I spent logging and releasing books was all for naught.

Thanks.


Comments: 2

Issues Considered: Books, Literature

What I’ve Been Reading — June 2007

July 1st, 2007

The Bluest EyeHeart of DarknessSlaughterhouse Five

Books Acquired:
Lots of Baby Books – Various Authors

Books Read:
The Bluest Eye – Toni Morrison
Heart of Darkness – Joseph Conrad
Slaughterhouse Five – Kurt Vonnegut

Man, I really wish I had an angle this month.

I don’t. I didn’t pick books that joined together seamlessly, like literary Legos. They didn’t fit together or lead to one another or paint a wide-sweeping theme that wows and amazes each of you in its grandiose-ness. Nope. I just read some books.

The only thing they really had in common was that they were, indeed books. I didn’t even really read that many – I mean, I spent the first week and a half finishing books I talked about last month. I do that sometimes. I prematurely celebrate so I can make it to the web on deadline.

The difference that last month is that I actually acknowledged that the books weren’t finished. That was my concession to you. I am honorable and just.

I really have been looking to carve a dent in my Essentials list, especially since a baby is on his/her way in a few weeks. Once he/she comes, my moratorium on short stories will be raised and I will be set free, able to wallow through stacks of short prose that will be easily digested in between naps and during midnight feedings.

Yeah right. I’m still dreaming. Let me be.

Our first baby shower brought a shower of books, actually. Each gift seemed to contain a children’s book or two, enough that we found ourselves with a healthy stack of books to add to our baby’s future room. We found later that this was by design – part of the theme of the shower was for everyone to bring their favorite children’s book to give to our forthcoming child. My mother, who couldn’t be there, even sent along a few. It was touching and very appropriate.

With that being said, I’m no longer mentioning the children’s books we acquire in this column. I can’t, really – we’re going to be filling closets with them in the upcoming years, and they really cease to belong to us as soon as they’re awarded to Baby Vilhauer. I’d lie if I said I wasn’t excited to read them myself, and thankfully I’ll get a chance to. Babies don’t learn to read until, like, two years old, right?

What? Older?

The books I read went as far to the opposite direction of “children’s book material” as possible – rape, jungle dangers and napalm bombing, to be specific. So either children have their precious minds shielded from the horrible realities of life, or they read all of the good stuff as kids and are forced to delve deeper into the more horrible depths of literature as they get older.

Toni Morrison’s The Bluest Eye was the first of these horrible depths. The book was recommended to me by Kerrie, who thought I wouldn’t quite get Morrison’s Beloved without reading one of her easier books first. This comment was repeated twice more by unrelated parties. I thought hard about taking Beloved on out of spite, thinking “I can read this! I’m a lerr-NED reader, and I don’t need no warm ups!” Instead, I conceded. Oh well.

It’s been a long time since I’ve delved into a novel written by an African American woman. Sorry – I should rephrase that. I don’t remember EVER delving into a novel written by an African American woman. The great thing is that I never once stopped and thought about the race and gender of the author. At times, it comes out – after all, a novel is only a natural extension of the author’s mind – but it’s only used to strengthen the story.

Morrison’s main character – Peola – is a girl that we really don’t see much. The story is told from the people around her – her friends, her family and a narrator. In the book, Peola is raped at a very young age. She carries a child – her father’s – and things go to hell.

But it’s the lead-up to this act that occupies the first 90% of the book. You don’t see a lot of Peola’s life. You instead see the people that shape her life. It’s a very sad story, but because of the way it’s written I’ll admit that, at times, I didn’t feel for Peola like I should have. I thought I was missing something. I liked it a lot, but I felt disconnected from Peola, like she wasn’t a real character to me, and anything that happened to her was bound to be pushed to the side.

And here’s the amazing thing. In the afterword, Toni Morrison admits as much. She feels that the book is flawed. What guts! A Nobel Prize winning author, admitting that her first book – a beloved (no pun intended) novel that chronicles a girl’s desire to be different; to have the bluest eyes and be normal – is written incorrectly. In the afterword, she describes what the book was supposed to be and considers what things should have been like. Then, finally, she snaps back into proud authorial mode and concludes that The Bluest Eye, like Peola, was written off until the re-issue.

From there I shifted gears completely, reading Heart of Darkness by Joseph Conrad. This is a high-school English teacher’s dream. It’s filled with symbolism that is only available to those that study hardest. It’s a difficult book – one that I would have hated growing up and didn’t quite flip head-over-heels for now that I am a mature reader. It takes a while to capture the vernacular and pacing. By that time, I was already a third of the way through.

Like the copy of Kafka’s Metamorphosis I read last summer, the actual Heart of Darkness story takes up only a quarter of the full print copy. The rest is stacked with essays and critiques and original manuscript notes and a bevy of other instantly forgettable things. I’ve given in on reading forwards and afterwards (I used to skip them, but I know better now) but I’m not going to take a 77 page story and spread it out over 300 pages just to read the same overly-philosophical drivel repeated over and over.

I liked the story. A sailor travels to what could be the Congo and discovers a legendary ivory trader. What makes the man legendary has nothing to do with what he truly is. Like any legend, his good parts are made godly, while his bad parts are likened to scourge. And this legend becomes a huge part of the sailor’s life, simply because he gets sucked into the idea – and the promise – of finding someone extraordinary.

The legend – Kurtz – appears only near the end. He’s important throughout, though, serving as one of the main characters in name only. He looms over everyone. In the end, of course, he’s only human. As far as the symbolism goes, I didn’t catch much of it. I was not reading as deeply as I could have. I liked the story, but I couldn’t dig the hidden meanings. I, too, am only human.

Our Book Club brought Vonnegut’s Slaughterhouse Five to the forefront again, and I figured that even though I had already read the book, I should take the hint and participate in some late Vonnegut Tribute Reading.

Slaughterhouse Five is a good book to read if you’re curious what made Vonnegut so popular – and different. He writes like no one else ever has. He has a style that is so distinctive that, within minutes, you can pick out his words from a pile of filled pages.

This book also serves as a semi-biographical account of the bombing of Dresden – a horrible napalm-jelly destruction that leveled one of Germany’s most beautiful (and, consequentially, least-Nazi) cities.

I sped though it pretty fast. It’s a time-traveling, war-philosophizing, science-fiction-based romp through every dimension and nearly every moment of the main character’s life. He comes unstuck in time and finds himself swinging wildly through every moment he has ever witnessed and every moment in the future. And while he’s at it, Vonnegut manages to make war sound ridiculous – as childish and unproductive as it truly is. It’s Catch-22 (or what I read of it) with aliens.

So that was my month. Next month is like a race for the gold. I have a short stack of books I’d like to read this year, not next, so I’m fighting to make time to get them finished. Don’t expect a theme next month either, really. Unless you’ve found a theme out of this mess.

If you have – if you can somehow connect alien abductions during napalm bombing, little girls who live the hardest life possible, and sailors in the Congo – let me know. Maybe everything was cosmically connected after all.


Comments: 2

Issues Considered: Books, Literature, What I've Been Reading