<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BMOWP&#8217;s Favorite Album of the Decade</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blackmarks.net/2009/12/28/bmowps-favorite-album-of-the-decade/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blackmarks.net/2009/12/28/bmowps-favorite-album-of-the-decade/</link>
	<description>"The unread story is not a story; it is little black marks on wood pulp. The reader, reading it, makes it live: a live thing, a story." -- Ursula K. Le Guin -- Writer, Reader, Amateur Interneter, Father and Life Chronicler.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:25:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corey Vilhauer</title>
		<link>http://www.blackmarks.net/2009/12/28/bmowps-favorite-album-of-the-decade/#comment-249034</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey Vilhauer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 13:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackmarks.net/?p=1544#comment-249034</guid>
		<description>@victor - You got to be nice to Kiel. I still listen to them all.

@jen - I started getting into Wolf Parade way too late for them to enter into the equation, but I do indeed love that album.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@victor &#8211; You got to be nice to Kiel. I still listen to them all.</p>
<p>@jen &#8211; I started getting into Wolf Parade way too late for them to enter into the equation, but I do indeed love that album.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jen</title>
		<link>http://www.blackmarks.net/2009/12/28/bmowps-favorite-album-of-the-decade/#comment-249030</link>
		<dc:creator>Jen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 03:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackmarks.net/?p=1544#comment-249030</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s my favorite of the decade as well. For me it&#039;s the only one that&#039;s held its value – from beginning to end. There have been others – White Blood Cells and Apologies to the Queen Mary come to mind – but none top The Moon and Antarctica.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s my favorite of the decade as well. For me it&#8217;s the only one that&#8217;s held its value – from beginning to end. There have been others – White Blood Cells and Apologies to the Queen Mary come to mind – but none top The Moon and Antarctica.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: victor</title>
		<link>http://www.blackmarks.net/2009/12/28/bmowps-favorite-album-of-the-decade/#comment-249029</link>
		<dc:creator>victor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 02:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackmarks.net/?p=1544#comment-249029</guid>
		<description>Radiohead are a great band that no one actually listens to. Face it, they make fantastic records, but who the hell listens to them after a few months.  Kiel M go jump in a lake!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Radiohead are a great band that no one actually listens to. Face it, they make fantastic records, but who the hell listens to them after a few months.  Kiel M go jump in a lake!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corey Vilhauer</title>
		<link>http://www.blackmarks.net/2009/12/28/bmowps-favorite-album-of-the-decade/#comment-249025</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey Vilhauer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 22:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackmarks.net/?p=1544#comment-249025</guid>
		<description>Top 4 Radiohead Albums of the Decade:

1. Kid A
2. Hail to the Thief
3. Amnesiac
4. In Rainbows

So, you see, there you go. To clarify, there&#039;s not a lot of difference in my liking of those four albums, and those four Radiohead albums are better than MOST everything else that was put out over the decade. Just saying - it&#039;s not my first choice - or my second or third.

Though, here&#039;s another list: Top 10 Greatest FUs to the Record Industry of the Decade:

1. In Rainbows: name your own price
2 - 10: doesn&#039;t matter. The In Rainbows thing was awesome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Top 4 Radiohead Albums of the Decade:</p>
<p>1. Kid A<br />
2. Hail to the Thief<br />
3. Amnesiac<br />
4. In Rainbows</p>
<p>So, you see, there you go. To clarify, there&#8217;s not a lot of difference in my liking of those four albums, and those four Radiohead albums are better than MOST everything else that was put out over the decade. Just saying &#8211; it&#8217;s not my first choice &#8211; or my second or third.</p>
<p>Though, here&#8217;s another list: Top 10 Greatest FUs to the Record Industry of the Decade:</p>
<p>1. In Rainbows: name your own price<br />
2 &#8211; 10: doesn&#8217;t matter. The In Rainbows thing was awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kiel M.</title>
		<link>http://www.blackmarks.net/2009/12/28/bmowps-favorite-album-of-the-decade/#comment-249023</link>
		<dc:creator>Kiel M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 21:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackmarks.net/?p=1544#comment-249023</guid>
		<description>Oop, I see a typo.
You typed MM&#039;s &quot;Moon and Antarctica&quot; instead of Radiohead&#039;s &quot;In Rainbows.&quot;
It&#039;s ok, I can see how that happens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oop, I see a typo.<br />
You typed MM&#8217;s &#8220;Moon and Antarctica&#8221; instead of Radiohead&#8217;s &#8220;In Rainbows.&#8221;<br />
It&#8217;s ok, I can see how that happens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 225/226 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via N/A

Served from: www.blackmarks.net @ 2012-02-09 08:46:51 -->
