Make the Web Personal

December 24th, 2010

Twitter is not an RSS feed. Facebook is not a list of promotions. Your Web site isn’t a board-driven portal for internal documents and buzz words.

Content isn’t simply the conduit with which you disseminate press releases. Yet, some of you continue to treat it that way.

Oh. No. I get it. You’re trying hard. Some of you are, at least. Some of you have taken great pains to manufacture an online strategy steeped in clickthrough rates and SEO and ROI and, you know, that’s great.

But what you haven’t done is create a reason to engage. You haven’t created a genuine personality.

By personality, I mean a common voice that works across every platform. One based in honesty and legitimate concern. You aim for the stats, but stuffing links and keywords doesn’t earn trust. It doesn’t make your site usable. It sure as hell doesn’t gain brand value or synergy, etc.

Content strategy gets pegged as a stat-based word puzzle. That’s part of it, to be sure. That’s not the WHOLE thing, though.

You aren’t talking to a robot. You aren’t talking to a site crawler, or an RSS feed. You aren’t even talking to an audience, whatever that means.

You’re talking to a real person. Every time.

Site crawlers, RSS feeds, analytics reports, and audiences don’t buy things. People do.

So when you start a Twitter page, do it with purpose. Provide real content to your users. Celebrate your voice, with aplomb, as if you were talking with someone over coffee, joyously relating the real benefits of your product/organization/whatever, and not as if you were serving dictation to a shopping news ad.

Ultimately, we need to remember a basic fact of communications and how it relates to relationships: we don’t connect to articles and stats and certifications, but to original thought and personality.

I thought we had been through this all already. But by the looks of some of you guys, it hasn’t quite set in yet.

Why not?


Leave A Comment

Issues Considered: Content Strategy

What I’ve Been Reading – Blankets/Persepolis

December 23rd, 2010

Okay, before I start, let’s lay this on the table.

What I’ve Read:

Blankets by Craig Thompson
Persepolis by Marjane Satrapi

There may be nothing more refreshing for someone who’s fallen off of the Reading Wagon than plowing through a 600-page graphic novel in a few hours, and certainly nothing more rewarding than doing it twice in a week. There’s this feeling of All Caps ACCOMPLISHMENT paired with All Caps RELIEF, like a baseball player hitting his way out of a slump.

BlanketsThat being said, I was initially concerned that my love for these two books – especially Craig Thompson’s Blankets, which was the first book I’d finished in months – is coincidental to the situation: I finally finished something of some heft, and the afterglow is hazing my rationality.

Thankfully, there’s a case against this: both books are fantastic.

Blankets’ heart-twanging, emo-without-being-tragic nature – it’s McSweeney’s without the pretention and twee – keeps popping up in my mind, much as Chris Ware’s Jimmy Corrigan continues to do. The power of the story resonates. The illustrations are burned into my brain. I am glad I was finally able to find a copy, and I don’t feel a bit of remorse in paying $20 for a book I rushed through and was finished with in three hours.

PersepolisAnd Persepolis – itself not as much of a riveting narrative as much as a clear look at Iranian culture, personal growth and the fight for emotional freedom – gave me the kind of insight into foreign culture that I rarely stumble upon anymore. It is an intimate look at war, but it’s a look at war from the eyes of a child turned college student turned grown woman; the war itself becomes a character, not a focus, as Marjane pushes through life in spite of the constant bombings and prejudice.

I won’t pretend to be any kind of graphic novel connoisseur, but these two things are true: Blankets is a beautiful story framed by beautiful illustration, and Persepolis is an important story framed by important context.

Yeah. I’m pretty impressed, and not just with myself. For once.


Comments: 2

Issues Considered: Books, Literature, What I've Been Reading

A Guide to the Open Internet

December 22nd, 2010

Hey, I don’t want to be all “ACT NOW BEFORE IT’S TOO LATE,” but, you should pay attention for a second. Before it’s too late.

There’s this thing called “net neutrality.” It’s a concept that’s often treated as an amorphous blob of policy wonkage. It’s also the number one reason we’re able to access the Internet openly and without boundaries.

The skinny: the FCC is currently proposing new regulations that threaten net neutrality. Maybe you haven’t heard much, yet. You would be forgiven – there haven’t been many good bird’s-eye-views of its importance.

Until now: A Guide to the Open Internet.

Network neutrality is the idea that your cellular, cable, or phone internet connection should treat all websites and services the same. Big companies like AT&T, Verizon, and Comcast want to treat them differently so they can charge you more depending on what you use.

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is currently debating legislation to define limits for internet service providers (ISPs). The hope is that they will keep the internet open and prevent companies from discriminating against different kinds of websites and services.

Not to be bossy, but CLICK THAT LINK. Scroll down. Learn the importance of net neutrality. And make it known that you won’t stand for it. Not you. Not me. Not your Netflix watching friend. Not your Farmville-obsessed mom. This isn’t political. This is an issue of lifestyle, finances, freedom and empowerment.

I’d hate to look back at 2010 as the salad days of Internet usage.


Leave A Comment

Issues Considered: Politics, Technology

Thoughts on “Winning Time: Reggie Miller vs. The New York Knicks”

December 20th, 2010

We want it all. We want the championship. We want the corner office. We want Best In Show.

We want success. We want top billing. Too often, we overlook the honor in lesser milestones.

Reggie Miller never won a championship. Patrick Ewing never won a championship. To take it a step further, their franchises – the Indiana Pacers and the New York Knicks – are championship-less since 1973. For all intents and purposes, every season since 1973 has been a failure.

Ask Reggie Miller, though, and you’ll find the opposite.

For Reggie, there were two goals each year: to win the championship, and to beat the Knicks. He never reached the first goal, but for one year, during the 1995 playoffs, he accomplished the second, beating the Knicks on the back of one of the game’s greatest performances.

He didn’t win the big one, but the drive to beat his rival was so great that it counted as success. It gave him peace.

In the end, history will play off the Pacers/Knicks rivalry as a third-tier story. It occurred during the Houston Rockets’ repeat championships, during both Michael Jordan eras, and – even later – parallel to the rebirth of the Los Angeles Lakers. It’s a footnote.

Still, there are few chances to see how a team finds ambition and pride in smaller goals. Each game was a challenge, each series a sort of miniature championship.
They fought not just to win the war, but to win each battle therein.

How often does this happen to us? How often do we feel disappointed when we win regionally, yet fail to find success nationally? How often do we look at a promotion as a step toward the top, not as something to be equally proud of? How often do we treat each project as a massive undertaking, instead of taking pride in each detail?

I’ve never written a best seller. I never became a nationally known copywriter. I have yet to headline A List Apart. But, more than anything, I’m learning that this doesn’t mean I’ve failed.

There are differing degrees of success, and we have to take them one at a time.

Reggie never won a championship. But he’s a few years away from becoming a Hall of Famer. He’s a relatively successful broadcaster. And, no matter what, he’s always got that 1995 series against the Knicks, where, for a few days, he felt like a champion.

Who’s to say he never succeeded? Come to think of it, who’s to say we haven’t, either?


Leave A Comment

Issues Considered: Basketball, Career, Indiana Pacers

Favorite Music of 2010: a series of lists

December 14th, 2010

Some lists. About music. Numbers do not denote rank – they are simply the order in which I typed them.

Favorite Albums From 2010

1. Girl Talk – All Day
2. Sleigh Bells – Treats
3. Arcade Fire – The Suburbs
4. Spoon – Transference
5. The New Pornographers – Together
6. Ben Folds/Nick Hornby – Lonely Avenue
7. LCD Soundsystem – London Sessions
8. Various Artists – Broken Hearts & Dirty Windows: Songs of John Prine
9. Frightened Rabbit – The Winter of Mixed Drinks
10. The Besnard Lakes – The Besnard Lakes are the Roaring Night

Favorite Albums From Before 2010 That I Didn’t Pay Attention To Until 2010

1. Various Artists – I’m Not There (Soundtrack)
2. The Avett Brothers – I and Love and You
3. Talking Heads – Stop Making Sense
4. Jim Ward – In the Valley, On the Shores
5. Fanfarlo – Reservoir

Favorite Old Vinyl From My Parents’ and Grandparents’ Collections

1. Neil Young – Harvest
2. Black Sabbath – Black Sabbath
3. Various Artists – The Concert for Bangla Desh
4. The Beatles – The Beatles
5. The Beatles – Let it Be

Favorite Old Vinyl Purchased or Received in 2010

1. Talking Heads – Stop Making Sense
2. Pink Floyd – Animals
3. Neil Young – Everybody Knows This Is Nowhere
4. John Prine – The Best of John Prine
5. Neil Young – Live Rust

Favorite Beatles Songs of 2010

1. “And Your Bird Can Sing”
2. “Dig a Pony”
3. “Something”
4. “Here Comes the Sun”
5. “Sexy Sadie”

Sierra’s Favorite Songs of 2010

1. “Here Comes the Sun” – The Beatles
2. “Particle Man” – They Might Be Giants
3. “Help!” – The Beatles
4. “My Sweet Lord” – George Harrison
5. “Yellow Submarine” – The Beatles

Favorite Albums From A Long Time Ago That I Had Completely Forgotten About

1. Mike Watt – Ball Hog or Tugboat?
2. The Promise Ring – Nothing Feels Good
3. R.E.M. – Automatically Live (bootleg)
4. P.E.E. – Now! More Charm & More Tender
5. Braid – Frame and Canvas

Favorite Covers Discovered/Embraced This Year

1. “The Ghost of Tom Joad” – Junip (2006)
2. “No One’s Gonna Love You” – Cee Lo Green (2010)
3. “Spanish Pipedream” – The Avett Brothers (2010)
4. “The Times They Are a Changin’” – Mason Jennings (2008)
5. “Take Me To the River” (live) – Talking Heads (1999 reissue)

Favorite Lists From This List of Music Lists

1. Favorite Old Vinyl From My Parents’ and Grandparents’ Collections
2. Sierra’s Favorite Songs of 2010
3. Favorite Beatles Songs of 2010
4. Favorite Albums From A Long Time Ago That I Had Completely Forgotten About
5. Favorite Lists From This List of Music Lists


Comments: 5

Issues Considered: Music, The Top...

46 lines, 13 rules

December 10th, 2010

46 lines.

13 rules.

Two words. “Basket Ball.”

And now, one price: 4.3 Million Dollars.

Dr. James Naismith’s original rules of basketball. Two pieces of paper that any basketball fan would love to see.
Two pieces of paper that, to quote the illustrious Indiana Jones, SHOULD BE IN A MUSEUM. Or, at the least, featured in the abomination that most call the Basketball Hall of Fame.

$4.3 Million.

To think, this aged typewritten document, pinned to the wall of a YMCA 119 years ago, scribbled on by Dr. Naismith himself and left unframed for its entire existence – unframed and equally unprotected! – gave birth to the game I love. A billion dollar industry. A sport played worldwide. A defining point in modern American culture.

$4.3 Million.

What a number.

And get this: it was purchased by a couple of U of K donors. Not by a former or current professional basketball player or coach – people who owe their entire fortunes to those two sheets of paper.

You can’t tell me someone like Michael Jordan or Shaquille O’Neal wasn’t interested. Because I know one thing. If I was a billionaire, I’d be right there. I’d have paid $4.3 Million.

For 46 lines? 13 rules? For the seed that created my favorite distraction?

Hell. I’d have paid a lot more.


Comments: 1

Issues Considered: Basketball, Sports

This is Abraham Lincoln’s hat

December 9th, 2010

This is Abraham Lincoln’s hat.

lincoln's hatIt’s unadorned. “It’s just a hat,” you’d think, if you saw it in the wild.

If you saw it in a museum, surrounded by other items, you might think it was just another dead person’s hat. You’d be okay in thinking that. It’s no different from that Monopoly guy’s hat. Or the hat of any businessman from the late 1800s.

Even if it was labeled “Abraham Lincoln’s Hat,” you’d probably only give it a passing glance. Your eyes, distracted by everything else, would fail to grasp the importance.

But it IS important. This is Abraham Lincoln’s hat. Abraham Lincoln. Yes. THAT Abraham Lincoln.

You place it on a pedestal. It begins to stand out.

You devote the hallway leading up to it to spelling out the importance of Abraham Lincoln. It begins to gain context.

You show images of Abraham Lincoln wearing the hat. It begins to develop its own history.

Finally, you light it, dramatically, handing out a lasting image to whoever walks by.

It goes from being just a hat to being Abraham Lincoln’s Hat. Capitalized. Important. Worth Looking At.

And, in that time, nothing has changed outside of how you presented it. You took something ordinary – because, let’s be honest, it’s still just a hat, though most certainly a hat worn by a famous President – and provided the context, visual cues and legend that can only be assigned to something worth remembering.

Taking the ordinary and making it beautiful. That’s why storytelling is important. Why graphic design is important. Why creativity is important.

“It’s just a hat.”

No. This is Abraham Lincoln’s hat. Pretty impressive, huh?


Comments: 7

Issues Considered: Content Strategy, Marketing, On..., Photography