Category: Books

May 8th, 2012

On one hand, you have childhood: the years in which we are children, when we do the things children do. And then there’s youth: the years in which we are shaped, in which we begin to learn and understand the world, when we recklessly soak up art and critique and influence.

The difference is subtle. One defines us by our age, while the other defines us for the future. One is dominated by developmental growth, while the other is defined by a growth of taste and intellect.

We’d expect one to come after the other. But sometimes, childhood and youth collide. Sometimes, we’re able to cherish simplicity while still moving forward. We capture the growth of childhood with the wildness of youth.

There are books that defy genre in this way. Rarely do those books end up on our children’s shelves.

Where the story does not just tweak the imagination, but is about imagination itself; where art is used as a bridge toward new worlds, where the most simple lines are delivered in a way that, generations later, authors can build upon them without losing the meaning. Without losing the feel of those monsters. Those wild things.

Childhood is about growing up, misbehaving, and understanding which boundaries can be broken. Youth is about taking those broken boundaries and learning how to use them. Without either, we have no art. We have no literature.

Where the Wild Things Are is as close to a perfect mix of childhood and youth as I’ve ever seen. What’s more, it’s a portal into the minds of my kids. Every day, I see a little bit of Max in their actions. Every day, I see it in their eyes. Every day, I remind myself that they’re kids, and they’re not being naughty – they’re being curious.

They’re moving away from childhood, and toward youth. They’re growing. Learning.

Thank you, Mr. Sendak. Thank you for standing up for the wild things. Every day.

“Please don’t go. We’ll eat you up, we love you so.”

RIP, Maurice Sendak.

Category: Books, Isaac, Sierra, Writers

March 6th, 2012

The now iconic Keep Calm and Carry On poster never used to be that iconic. It was never actually released for the public – a design left in the back room, ready to be launched in the event of invasion.

It was never released. But it was found – in a bookstore in Alnwick, England: Barter Books.

In the end, the poster was never officially issued, and it remained unseen by the public, until a copy turned up more than 50 years later. It was found in a second-hand bookshop called Barter Books in the northeast corner of England.

Barter books was begun in 1991 by a couple: Stuart and Mary Manley. They building used to be an old Victorian railway station. Huge rows of stacked shelves now stand in place where the tracks would have been, but the stations old tea rooms and waiting rooms are still there.

It was in 2000 that Stuart found the poster in a box of dusty old books that had been bought at auction. Mary liked it so much she had it framed and put it up near the shop till, and it proved so popular with the customers that a year later they began to sell copies.

I had the opportunity to visit Barter Books in 2000 while I was visiting Kerrie during her study abroad semester in Alnwick, England. When I envision the perfect bookstore, Barter Books is what comes to mind. To have this story connected to something I hold so dear – and, to be honest, something I still think of as my little secret – is wonderful.

Via Kottke.org.

April 12th, 2011

So let’s not try to tackle an in depth review of Erin Kissane’s The Elements of Content Strategy, because the book itself is very good and we won’t do it much justice other than to say “you should read this if you’re into content strategy and want to get better and need a great little book to keep by your computer.”

What I’ve Read:

The Elements of Content Strategy – Erin Kissane

What we CAN tackle, though, is the process of restraint. The idea that a guidebook doesn’t need to be exhaustive. It simply needs to guide us. Hence the name. Guide. Book.

The Elements of Content StrategyUntil recently, books on internet design and development were usually thick, barely readable tomes, their weight enough to turn off even the most aspiring practitioner. I suspect this is why web development was a smaller field a decade ago: not because the web was just a showdown away from becoming the Wild West, but because no one could bother to read the damned books that helped explain the process.

That’s not the case anymore. Sure, Information Architecture for the World Wide Web continues to double every few years, but for the most part the important books are becoming thinner, their authors rightfully jettisoning the backstory and getting right to the point.

In the case of Kissane’s Elements, two ideals reign over everything:
#1 – The desire to create something small and usable
#2 – The understanding that the “WHY” has already been covered

This book is dense. It took me two hours to read. It’s packed with “HOW.” Enough “HOW” that it really will get a special spot next to my computer, much like how Strunk and White used to sit just within my reach.

You don’t START with this book. You start with Halvorson. Then you read Kissane. And then, if you can handle the excitement, you turn to the most important part of the book: the appendix, where Erin talks about all of the other great resources, and then you get your boss to order all of the books that sound interesting, and then you get excited to read them, and then you realize the hidden benefits of this book.

That it’s a guide for both “how to do the job” and “how to further your knowledge.” And, in turn, the field.

No kissing ass here, and no hyperbole: this book is one of the good ones. Short. Sweet. Fantastic. Some books make you smarter. This one makes you better. Go read it.

April 12th, 2011

Through two books, hundreds of posts, a unwavering belief in what makes basketball beautiful and an undying devotion to the 2006-07 Warriors, Free Darko dissected the finer points of the game through complication and loftiness.

Free Darko ShirtYesterday, they closed the doors.

It’s a sad day for basketball blogs, yes. But there’s also freedom. As the partners continue doing what they do, we’ll look at Free Darko as a starting point. Chitwood & Hobbs puts it best:

When I think of the end of FreeDarko I find parallels with the punk band Operation Ivy.

Operation Ivy was a punk-ska band that existed between 1987 and 1989. In those two years Op Ivy performed 185 shows and recorded 32 songs. They went on a national tour, began booking larger venues, and felt pressure to sign with a major label — instead they broke up. They flamed out.

The good news is that the idea of Op Ivy didn’t die with the band. They were arguably even more successful after they broke up. Their only studio album, Energy, has sold more than 500,000 copies and the iconic band has been credited with the 1990’s punk revival in California. They are a worldwide cult success. Tim Armstrong parlayed Op Ivy’s success with Rancid, the Hellcat Records label, and a lucrative song writing profession for artists such as Pink and Gwen Stefani.

The posts. The art. The random references I never understood. At least I’ll always have the books.

December 23rd, 2010

Okay, before I start, let’s lay this on the table.

What I’ve Read:

Blankets by Craig Thompson
Persepolis by Marjane Satrapi

There may be nothing more refreshing for someone who’s fallen off of the Reading Wagon than plowing through a 600-page graphic novel in a few hours, and certainly nothing more rewarding than doing it twice in a week. There’s this feeling of All Caps ACCOMPLISHMENT paired with All Caps RELIEF, like a baseball player hitting his way out of a slump.

BlanketsThat being said, I was initially concerned that my love for these two books – especially Craig Thompson’s Blankets, which was the first book I’d finished in months – is coincidental to the situation: I finally finished something of some heft, and the afterglow is hazing my rationality.

Thankfully, there’s a case against this: both books are fantastic.

Blankets’ heart-twanging, emo-without-being-tragic nature – it’s McSweeney’s without the pretention and twee – keeps popping up in my mind, much as Chris Ware’s Jimmy Corrigan continues to do. The power of the story resonates. The illustrations are burned into my brain. I am glad I was finally able to find a copy, and I don’t feel a bit of remorse in paying $20 for a book I rushed through and was finished with in three hours.

PersepolisAnd Persepolis – itself not as much of a riveting narrative as much as a clear look at Iranian culture, personal growth and the fight for emotional freedom – gave me the kind of insight into foreign culture that I rarely stumble upon anymore. It is an intimate look at war, but it’s a look at war from the eyes of a child turned college student turned grown woman; the war itself becomes a character, not a focus, as Marjane pushes through life in spite of the constant bombings and prejudice.

I won’t pretend to be any kind of graphic novel connoisseur, but these two things are true: Blankets is a beautiful story framed by beautiful illustration, and Persepolis is an important story framed by important context.

Yeah. I’m pretty impressed, and not just with myself. For once.

October 18th, 2010

I read Chuck Klosterman’s Sex, Drugs and Cocoa Puffs with apprehension because it deserved apprehension. It’s a book of over-thought pop culture arguments, the ones you might expect having with a roomful of probably drunk college friends, and that reason alone gives one pause – are these arguments worth diving into over an entire book?

What I’ve Read:

Eating the Dinosaur by Chuck Klosterman

But even more than that, Sex, Drugs and Cocoa Puffs was a guidebook for the geeky-but-not-quite legions of ironic thought: in essence, a rallying cry for those who found pleasure in debating the validity of Saved by the Bell’s influence simply because it was ironic to ever have considered Saved by the Bell influential at all.

Eating DinosaurUpon first read, I gave it two stars. A day later, I realized that I actually liked the book, and upgraded it to four.

I went into the book expecting to be annoyed by it. I was. And yet, I wasn’t. Because, let’s face it – those geeky-but-not-quite legions of ironic thought?

They’re my people. I’m probably one of them. *shudder*

Eating the Dinosaur, however, is different. It still follows the same patterns as Klosterman’s first essay collection, but it’s done in a way that’s both researched and filled with wisdom. These are no longer the essays of a college pop culture argument, but an almost Gladwell-ian look at the parts of pop culture that shape us.

Except that, unlike Malcolm Gladwell shaky attempts at the transitive property, Klosterman makes valid observations proven by common sense: The funniest shows are those without laugh tracks because we’re allowed to laugh for ourselves; voyeurism is natural and not at all creepy; football innovates specifically because it’s the most creative sport in the world.

It boils down to this: where Sex, Drugs and Cocoa Puffs was a drunken romp through irrelevancy, Eating the Dinosaur is a buzzed discussion during after-work drinks.

Klosterman seems more grown up, is what I’m trying to get at. Thankfully. Because he’s better served that way.

September 27th, 2010

Let’s take two men on opposing sides of an issue and throw them in front of an audience of casual spectators. Let’s give them what is somewhat of a hot-button issue, at least at this event. Let’s say the event is a book festival. Let’s say the issue is the increasing market share of e-readers and what it means to the landscape of literature, publishing and reading itself.

Let’s say one of these guys is Michael Hart, founder of Project Gutenberg, an organization that seeks through the e-book format to make accessible all of the world’s greatest works, including some that – with permission – are still in copyright. While we’re at it, let’s go ahead and say the other guy is Michael Dirda, a Fullbright Fellowship recipient and Pulitzer Prize-winning Washington Post book critic.

(Let’s also say Marilyn Johnson, author and library stalwart, is there, representing the middle ground but unable to get a word in edgewise.)

Now, let’s sit back and wait for an answer we’ll never get.

Because neither of these men is interested in bridging the gap between the promise and accessibility of ebooks and the tangible joy and art of physical binding. Neither of these men is interested in discussing how Project Gutenberg offers limitless preservation of what used to be the fragile and time-consuming practice of book collecting, and neither is interested in discussing how a mix of both physical and e-books helps people rediscover the joys of reading.

Instead, both men want a pissing match.

E-books are awful, a slap in the face of literature, and you water down the process of literary experience by missing out on the feel and texture of the book itself.

Physical books are pointless, archaic, space-hogging and inefficient, and everyone should read books electronically because you can fit 30,000 on one disc.

It’s one or the other. Love it or leave it. If you’re not with ‘em, you’re against ‘em.

Now, let’s vent. Because after seeing the previous example, live, in person, at the Sioux Falls Orpheum, in front of hundreds of interested people attending the South Dakota Festival of Books, I came away feeling disgusted and disappointed, frustrated that the promise of what could have been a great discussion turned out to be a symposium on Michael Hart’s inability to look behind his own project and Michael Dirda’s weak attempts at playing the same game.

The real issue is how we use e-books to further literature and adapt with the times, understanding that even ancient scrolls were pushed out by the more efficient book format, and that was thousands of years ago. Books will never go away – Dirda’s point on the art and tangible feeling that comes with reading a physical book is right on – but we can’t be naive in thinking it’s the only way to read.

Not when so many people are living without access to physical books. Not when you can provide a book in seconds to a willing audience. And especially not when there is already a drop in literacy rates and willingness to let books OF ALL TYPES fall by the wayside.

Traditional books and their texture? They mean nothing unless someone reads them.

30,000 books on a disc, for free? THEY ALSO MEAN NOTHING UNLESS SOMEONE READS THEM.

Let’s pretend that the two sides sat down and discussed the future of reading. The future of publishing. The future of literature and writing and everything that goes along with it, because, let’s face it, the future of reading is also the future of education and the future of our countries and the future of the world.

Let’s pretend the only agenda brought into this panel was one of collaboration and innovation.

Don’t I wish that was the case.