Category: Science

Cloak of invisibility

August 12th, 2008

According to Scientific American, we’re getting closer to living out our weird Harry Potter-themed dreams.

Invisibility cloaks.

To be exact, it’s not true invisibility – it’s more of an optical illusion. But it’s getting closer, and the ramifications could be incredible, – at least, if not in real life, then throughout military and espionage fields.

From Scientific American’s site:

“We are not actually cloaking anything,” Valentine said in a telephone interview. “I don’t think we have to worry about invisible people walking around any time soon. To be honest, we are just at the beginning of doing anything like that.”

Valentine’s team made a material that affects light near the visible spectrum, in a region used in fiber optics.

“In naturally occurring material, the index of refraction, a measure of how light bends in a medium, is positive,” he said.

“When you see a fish in the water, the fish will appear to be in front of the position it really is. Or if you put a stick in the water, the stick seems to bend away from you.”

Imagine. You swoop the cloak over your body, effectively rendering yourself invisible, the light from around you cascading in different directions, fooling your enemies like a magician cutting his assistant in half. You’ve gone missing. Secret.

Pretty neat. Of course, I’d rather have the Marauder’s Map. MUCH more useful.


Leave A Comment

Issues Considered: Science

Studying expressionism

June 19th, 2008

Where do our facial expressions come from?

Charles Darwin tackled the subject in his book The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals, and now a study published in Nature Neuroscience has revisited the question.

(Check out NPR.com for the full audio version of the article.)

It seems that facial expressions were developed to create a survival advantage. For instance, an expression of fear increases sensory information by opening up the eyes, flaring the nostrils and speeding up eye movements, allowing for better peripheral vision and faster breathing. An expression of disgust elicits an opposite response, scrunching up the face to shut out unpleasant sensory information. It all makes a lot of sense – so much that I’m surprised it hadn’t been noticed before.

Of course, it had never been studied before – at least, not since Darwin threw together his thoughts 125 years ago. It seems like such a simple subject, a natural point of curiosity. Why smile? Why frown? Why were these expressions ever developed, outside of simple communication?

It’s something that seems very interesting to me. Yet, despite purchasing Darwin’s book over a decade ago, I’ve never opened it.

I will admit, at times I feel a twinge of the excitment I used to experience while studying science years ago. It’s a facinating field, one filled with constant dicovery, one that slowly uncovers every secret of our life.

So though I’ve never opened Darwin’s book, I can’t help but thinking that, even if it’s just for a chapter or two, it’s about time I did.


Comments: 2

Issues Considered: Books, Journalism, Science