Category: Television

It’s berry good news!

March 9th, 2009

I’ve got a few posts in the pipeline, but life is pretty busy with the house and the kid and the work and what not.

So instead, you’ll have to make do with this: The Greatest Cereal Commercial Ever.

It’s for Nintendo Cereal, complete with a theme song that I still surprisingly remember word for word despite not seeing it since the mid 1980s. I can’t remember my own name, half of the time, but I can remember this.

The commercial skips the first 3 seconds (“Nintendo – it’s for breakfast now!”) which explains the sudden switch in music and lack of rhyme.

Also, if I remember correctly, this cereal was awful.

Found at A Tribute to Discontinued Cereal, via brandflakesforbreakfast.


Comments: 1

Issues Considered: Marketing, Television, Videos

Teamwork!

February 25th, 2009

Here are some of the words Sierra knows.

Bye bye.
Mommy.
Daddy.
Ball.
Moon.
Sky.

Teamwork.

Wait. What?

Yup. You read that right. Sierra knows the word “teamwork.” I should be afraid – after all, she could be morphing straight from 18-month-old to middle management office wonk. But I’m not.

She’s an avid fan of Nickelodeon’s Wonder Pets, a cute little show that features a duck, a turtle and a guinea pig. The theme of the show is working together as a group to solve problems. “What’s going to work?” they sing. “Teamwork!”

And this is how Sierra knows the word.

In other words, watch what you say. She’s eighteen months. And just like every kid at eighteen months, she’s a sponge.

She’s an adorable, babbling, mostly incoherent sponge.


Comments: 4

Issues Considered: Sierra, Television, Words

On searching for dignity

January 14th, 2009

Television news is in search of ratings. More than anything.

It’s not about journalistic integrity, or a dedication to informing the community. It’s ratings, only, above all, without question. It’s programming, not journalism; entertainment, not scholarship.

I often forget this fact until it’s thrown in my lap.

Yesterday, a friend was arrested for intentional damage to property and aggravated assault. (Not a close friend, but a friend all the same.) I don’t know the details any more than anyone else. I do know that is a good guy.

I also know that he has had mental health problems in his past. Reportedly, they seemed to have begun developing again.

The offenses are indefensible. He walked through his neighborhood and struck at windows with a shovel. Eventually, he threatened a human being. No motive, no cause. Just a mixed up mind, I suspect.

But the coverage by a local station was even more indefensible.

“Neighbors say they’ve had a few interactions with the suspect, just to know he was a little off…”

“It’s really weird that the one [neighbor] I happened to meet ends up being the crazy one.”

“Definitely get to know your neighbors. Too bad you can’t get a background check on them beforehand.”

Snickers. The slo-mo perp walk. Obviously biased interviews. Just another story about another crazy guy, so let’s see what we’ve got for weather!

Whether it’s the Wheel of Justice or a habit of trivializing tragedy to point out fault, the heavy handed holier-than-thou approach that local television news programs take when reporting is contrary to the very core of good journalism.

Of treating every story with dignity. Every person with decency. Every news item with respect.

It’s all part of the news cycle on television, keeping us up to date on the ridiculousness of life, looking for the angle in every story whether or not it’s decent to do so, chuckling along as they shake their heads, saying, “Life might suck, but at least you’re not as screwed up as THAT guy.”

It’s all a big joke, until you realize it’s someone you know.

Today, the Argus Leader printed their version of the story. Just the fact. No assumption. No cute cracks about crazy people.

Because cute cracks about crazy people don’t belong in journalism.

Print may be dying, but I’ll take its dignity over television’s sensationalism any day.

“I believe that the journalism which succeeds the best-and best deserves success-fears God and honors man … seeks to give every man a chance, and as far as law, an honest wage and recognition of human brotherhood can make it so, an equal chance … is a journalism of humanity, of and for today’s world.”
-Walter Williams


Leave A Comment

Issues Considered: Friends, Journalism, On..., Sioux Falls, Television

Who ya gonna call?

December 5th, 2008

Ohmygodohmygodohmygodohmygodohmygod!!! This might be the last game I ever buy for PS2.

(And yes. That IS Bill Murray. omgomgomgomgomgomgomg.)


Comments: 1

Issues Considered: Movies, Television

What I’ve Been Reading – November 2008

December 4th, 2008

For a few years, we didn’t have cable. It wasn’t a huge loss, actually. We read a lot more, and fell in love with certain network television shows. We watched new episodes of Law and Order instead of reruns. We enjoyed each other’s company. We grew fond of the ideology of going cable-less.

Books acquired:

FreeDarko Presents the Macrophenomenal Pro Basketball Almanac – FreeDarko

R.E.M.: Murmur (33 1/3) – J. Niimi

Bob Dylan: Highway 61 Revisited (33 1/3) – Mark Polizzotti

The Pixies: Doolittle (33 1/3) – Ben Sisario

Beastie Boys: Paul’s Boutique (33 1/3) – Dan LeRoy

Books read:

Deadwood – Pete Dexter

FreeDarko Presents the Macrophenomenal Pro Basketball Almanac – FreeDarko

Heat – Bill Buford

Then we moved our television into the basement. We no longer received our channels as clearly as we used to. We lost PBS. We priced out an HD antenna, knowing we’d eventually need to go that route, and found that it would cost upwards of $200 just to have it installed.

We succumbed. With Sierra on the way, we needed a more passive form of entertainment. And cable was brought back into the house.

During my time with cable television over the past five years (both before and after the disconnect) there have been three constants – three undeniable can’t miss entertainment options that would always be recorded or, at least, considered appointment television: HBO’s Deadwood, Bravo’s Top Chef, and NBA basketball.

Lo and behold: my month’s reading list.

As if conceding that I’d never get back to reading until I could somehow bridge the path from my sad television addiction to my love for the written word, I found myself reading the exact combination of subjects that forced me into television’s warm womb in the first place. Amazingly, it was all though pure coincidence.

Let’s start with Dexter’s Deadwood, my annual South Dakota Festival of Books Pete Dexter purchase. Every year, without fail, I see him speak at the festival and every year, also without fail, I seem to gravitate toward his “aw shucks” mentality – a New York attitude with South Dakota sensibilities, tough enough to hold grudges but smart enough to let them pass.

This year he spent a considerable amount of time talking about his screenplays. One of these screenplays was for a film based off of Deadwood, his historically based fictional recount of Wild Bill Hickok and Charley Utter as they arrived in South Dakota’s most legendary city. He hinted that this screenplay ended up being the basis of HBO’s television series of the same name.

Very similar characters. Same setting. It all seemed very familiar to Dexter, though HBO denied ever seeing the original screenplay or even consulting the novel. Dexter was left out in the cold – his idea essentially stolen and made into one of the most successful HBO dramas not called The Sopranos. There was no point in suing, as the rewards would be less than the attorney fees. We were all left wondering what the real story was.

Regardless, as a fan of the television show, the book was welcome reminder of the power of the characters involved. While Sheriff Bullock takes a smaller role, and some of Swearengen’s best developed cronies failed to even show up, the partnership between Utter and Wild Bill was just as you imagined it – complicated, honoreable and filled with envy. Even the friction between Utter and Calamity Jane was reminiscent of the television show.

However, as is the case with most “to-screen fiction,” Dexter’s Deadwood serves as a more emotional and deep look at the time and the people than HBO’s Deadwood ever could. Chalk it up as another case of the book being better than the video production. I’ll just assume that it’s a kind of karmic payback for Dexter losing his idea in the first place.

On the trip from Wild West emotion to kitchen etiquette, you might think something would get lost. But if there’s any place left in America that harkens back to the mindset of the gunslinging, fight-for-your-place, Wild West culture, it’s the professional American kitchen. And it’s this turmoil- and adrenaline-fueled environment that Bill Buford, author of Among the Thugs (an amazing insider view of the soccer hooligan phenomenon) sought to encroach upon.

Using celebrity chef Mario Batali as his muse, Buford makes his way through the seedy underbelly of the modern American professional kitchen, learning its tricks the way a child learns to walk: by falling on his face. Constantly. It’s a brutal battle for Buford – he’s both slightly unqualified and slightly despised as a celebrity journalist in the middle of a hotly contested kitchen. He’s in the way. He’s naïve. Most of all, he’s astutely able to show just how difficult it can be.

From two seasons worth of Top Chef and several seasons worth of other behind-the-scenes cooking shows and books, including Anthony Bourdain’s Kitchen Confidential, I understand the difficulty of cooking in a restaurant setting. I sure as hell know I couldn’t do it. Look at those people. Just look at them!

This is what separates Heat from the rest – instead of a professional talking about his or her rise, or a series of talented chefs working their way through a contest, we’re looking at a complete amateur trying to learn the craft in an abbreviated amount of time. Not just the craft in general, but a very specific and very beloved section of that craft – Italian cooking.

It’s a thrill if you love learning about this kind of thing – for me, a lower-tier cook even at the amateur level, there’s a feeling of vicariousness, as if Buford is working the long hours and sustaining the horrid burns in order to bring this level of the craft to us in a way we can understand. His failures and discoveries become ours. His love for Italian cooking becomes ours.

But even a gastronomical revelation couldn’t keep me from an even truer love – pro basketball, the last frontier of athletics in a football-dominated country. And when The Macrophenomenal Pro Basketball Almanac was released, I fell in love even more with what I still consider the most beautiful game in the world.

I was excited when this book was announced. The Web site alone sold me – and when I was able to cash in a handful of Discover Cash Back Awards, I instantly thought of this book. It arrived (adorned with several 33 1/3 books I ordered for research on a proposal) and I stopped everything. The book became my life. It was finished in just three days.

Written in what at times seems like a constant state of hyperbole, FreeDarko’s tome is a testament to two things: the superstar as savior and the book as a work of art. First, we’re given a short assessment of some of the league’s most recognizable players, from unquestionable floor leaders like Kevin Garnett and Kobe Bryant to the game’s biggest cancers (think Stephon Marbury and Ron Artest.) In the middle, we’re given some of the coolest illustrations and design I’ve seen in any book.

Then, we’re treated to the stunning beauty of a well-bound and illustrated book. If McSweeney’s ever branched out and released a basketball book, this would be it. Come to think of it, it’s no coincidence that FreeDarko was a regular contributor to the McSweeney’s blog several years ago. The two go hand in hand – intelligence with an eye for beauty, looking for hidden truths in the cold confines of numbers and statistics.

Would you like a player-by-player description of the monumentally bad 2000 draft (listed in the “Cancers” section)? Would you like to see a graphic representation of how most “Euro” players aren’t really European? Would you enjoy learning to love Kobe for his drive, or suspecting LeBron for his cold, calculated way of attaining success? This isn’t your typical message board prose – this is well-thought-out, intelligently written and perfectly articulated basketball talk. The kind you would expect to see in Sports Illustrated, if that magazine had the balls to do something original once in a while.

More than anything, the FreeDarko tome allowed me to better see the complexity of basketball. Just as Heat illustrated the difficulty (and, in turn, the jaw dropping ability needed) in cooking professional cooking, and just as Deadwood illustrated the deeper emotions in living a Wild West lifestyle.

It took the sanitized, time-shortened and over-produced nature of the television shows I love and allowed me to peek inside, to see the inner workings of each concept. In doing so, it also reintroduced me to an interesting concept: reading as both learning and entertainment, treating my bookshelf as if it was a remote control, with hundreds of different stories at my fingers.

It reminded me of what I was missing all those months, routinely reading the same type of book over and over again, getting stuck in a rut, forever wondering why I kept forcing my way through something I wasn’t fully into.

I’m back on the saddle, friends. I’m ready to be the reader I was always meant to be.


Comments: 1

Issues Considered: Basketball, Books, Literature, Television, What I've Been Reading

Election night special

November 4th, 2008

Blue and red. Percentages. Calling a state. Graphics and experts and legends.

Take everything you love about sports coverage. The predictions, the numbers, the human interest stories. The battle of good and evil, of your team and their team, of underdogs and how the standings will shake out when it’s all said and done.

Now apply this to something with real consequence. Like the future of our country’s policies.

Ladies and Gentlemen, I present to you Election Night Coverage!

It’s all there. Talking heads, trained to interpret and console, to think logically in the wake of so many decisions. They’re there to make you feel better. They’re Al Michaels or Pat Summerall, prepared to sum up the election in a matter of sentences.

There’s the opinion men and women, the John Maddens, the Tony Kornheisers, all prepared to put a little spin on the whole proceedings. They take the simple facts and turn them into speculation, both preparing us for the possible and reminding us of the excitement – the thrill of the chase.

Stats appeal to those who love concrete details. Candidate parties appeal to those who want to be included. Talk of surprising winners appeals to the underdog-chasers, and tales of real people doing real things touch a nerve in all of us.

This is our process. Our selection. We choose these people to run our country, and in these first few hours after polls close, our optimism (or pessimism, if your candidate is losing) is at its peak. If we win, we’re almost positive that everything will be perfect. If we lose, it might as well be the end of the world.

If you know what’s good for you, you’ve already voted – or at least you’ve made plans to vote. Now, sit back and watch this crazy process unfold. Grab a beer, make predictions – hell, take bets if it makes things more exciting.

You only get to see this kind of spectacle once every four years. Grab your foam fingers and start rooting for your candidate.

Because it’s all downhill from here.


Comments: 7

Issues Considered: Politics, Television

Less is more

October 27th, 2008

The CBS studio crew during football games consists of five people. Three former players, a former coach and a sports broadcast veteran.

The FOX crew is even larger. If you count the robot, it’s close to breaking double digits.

Post-debate coverage on the major 24-hour news channels turned into a rotation of several experts, pundits and other personalities. In one surreal television moment, Anderson Cooper sat in between a dozen people, squashed together behind two too-small news desks, shooting off questions like a semi-automatic firearm, fighting for space and for clarity.

Walter Cronkite would report on his own. By himself. No experts, or former employees, or anyone that would distract from the one important thing: the news. You listened to him as an expert. As a trusted voice. As a thick syrup of news, coating and lasting, irreplaceable, a true benefit to the station.

The more people you fit on a stage, the more watered down their message will become. They will receive fewer opportunities to talk, which makes them less and less important as individuals in the larger picture. And if they’re less important, then what’s stopping us from simply tuning them out?

My suggestion to television news and sports programs. Experts are good. But keep them at a minimum, please. Because when everyone starts sounding the same, it doesn’t really matter if your announcer is a former football player, or if your pundit is the premier historian in regards to presidential politics. They’re just another head on a 10-headed media monster.

And cutting one off doesn’t seem to matter.


Leave A Comment

Issues Considered: Annoyances, Football, Politics, Television